IntroductionIn this article, I want to tell you about SQL Server 7.0/2000 Transaction Isolation Levels, what kinds of Transaction Isolation Levels exist, and how you can set the appropriate Transaction Isolation Level, about Lock types and Locking optimizer hints, about deadlocks, and about how you can view locks by using the sp_lock stored procedure.
There are four isolation levels:
Microsoft SQL Server supports all of these Transaction Isolation Levels and can separate REPEATABLE READ and SERIALIZABLE.
Let me to describe each isolation level.
READ UNCOMMITTEDWhen it's used, SQL Server not issue shared locks while reading data. So, you can read an uncommitted transaction that might get rolled back later. This isolation level is also called dirty read. This is the lowest isolation level. It ensures only that a physically corrupt data will not be read.
READ COMMITTEDThis is the default isolation level in SQL Server. When it's used, SQL Server will use shared locks while reading data. It ensures that a physically corrupt data will not be read and will never read data that another application has changed and not yet committed, but it not ensures that the data will not be changed before the end of the transaction.
REPEATABLE READWhen it's used, the dirty reads and nonrepeatable reads cannot occur. It means that locks will be placed on all data that is used in a query, and another transactions cannot update the data.
This is the definition of nonrepeatable read from SQL Server Books Online:
SERIALIZABLEMost restrictive isolation level. When it's used, the phantom values cannot occur. It prevents other users from updating or inserting rows into the data set until the transaction will be completed.
This is the definition of phantom from SQL Server Books Online:
This is the syntax from SQL Server Books Online:
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
Shared locks are used for operations that do not change or update data, such as a SELECT statement.
Update locks are used when SQL Server intends to modify a page, and later promotes the update page lock to an exclusive page lock before actually making the changes.
Exclusive locks are used for the data modification operations, such as UPDATE, INSERT, or DELETE.
Shared locks are compatible with other Shared locks or Update locks.
Update locks are compatible with Shared locks only.
Exclusive locks are not compatible with other lock types.
Let me to describe it on the real example. There are four processes, which attempt to lock the same page of the same table. These processes start one after another, so Process1 is the first process, Process2 is the second process and so on.
Process1 : SELECT
Process2 : SELECT
Process3 : UPDATE
Process4 : SELECT
Process1 sets the Shared lock on the page, because there are no another locks on this page.
Process2 sets the Shared lock on the page, because Shared locks are compatible with other Shared locks.
Process3 wants to modify data and wants to set Exclusive lock, but it cannot make it before Process1 and Process2 will be finished, because Exclusive lock is not compatible with other lock types. So, Process3 sets Update lock.
Process4 cannot set Shared lock on the page before Process3 will be finished. So, there is no Lock starvation. Lock starvation occurs when read transactions can monopolize a table or page, forcing a write transaction to wait indefinitely. So, Process4 waits before Process3 will be finished.
After Process1 and Process2 were finished, Process3 transfer Update lock into Exclusive lock to modify data. After Process3 was finished, Process4 sets the Shared lock on the page to select data.
SQL Server 7.0/2000 supports the following Locking optimizer hints:
NOLOCK is also known as "dirty reads". This option directs SQL Server not to issue shared locks and not to honor exclusive locks. So, if this option is specified, it is possible to read an uncommitted transaction. This results in higher concurrency and in lower consistency.
HOLDLOCK directs SQL Server to hold a shared lock until completion of the transaction in which HOLDLOCK is used. You cannot use HOLDLOCK in a SELECT statement that includes the FOR BROWSE option. HOLDLOCK is equivalent to SERIALIZABLE.
UPDLOCK instructs SQL Server to use update locks instead of shared locks while reading a table and holds them until the end of the command or transaction.
TABLOCK takes a shared lock on the table that is held until the end of the command. If you also specify HOLDLOCK, the lock is held until the end of the transaction.
PAGLOCK is used by default. Directs SQL Server to use shared page locks.
TABLOCKX takes an exclusive lock on the table that is held until the end of the command or transaction.
Perform a scan with the same locking semantics as a transaction running at the READ COMMITTED isolation level. By default, SQL Server operates at this isolation level.
Equivalent to NOLOCK.
Perform a scan with the same locking semantics as a transaction running at the REPEATABLE READ isolation level.
Perform a scan with the same locking semantics as a transaction running at the SERIALIZABLE isolation level. Equivalent to HOLDLOCK.
Skip locked rows. This option causes a transaction to skip over rows locked by other transactions that would ordinarily appear in the result set, rather than block the transaction waiting for the other transactions to release their locks on these rows. The READPAST lock hint applies only to transactions operating at READ COMMITTED isolation and will read only past row-level locks. Applies only to the SELECT statement.
You can only specify the READPAST lock in the READ COMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ isolation levels.
Use row-level locks rather than use the coarser-grained page- and table-level locks.
You can specify one of these locking options in a SELECT statement.
This is the example:
SELECT au_fname FROM pubs..authors (holdlock)
Deadlock occurs when two users have locks on separate objects and each user wants a lock on the other's object. For example, User1 has a lock on object "A" and wants a lock on object "B" and User2 has a lock on object "B" and wants a lock on object "A". In this case, SQL Server ends a deadlock by choosing the user, who will be a deadlock victim. After that, SQL Server rolls back the breaking user's transaction, sends message number 1205 to notify the user's application about breaking, and then allows the nonbreaking user's process to continue.
You can decide which connection will be the candidate for deadlock victim by using SET DEADLOCK_PRIORITY. In other case, SQL Server selects the deadlock victim by choosing the process that completes the circular chain of locks.
So, in a multiuser situation, your application should check the error 1205 to indicate that the transaction was rolled back, and if it's so, restart the transaction.
Note. To reduce the chance of a deadlock, you should minimize the size of transactions and transaction times.
Sometimes you need a reference to information about locks. Microsoft recommends using the sp_lock system stored procedure to report locks information. This very useful procedure returns the information about SQL Server process ID, which lock the data, about locked database, about locked table ID, about locked page and about type of locking (locktype column).
This is the example of using the sp_lock system stored procedure:
spid locktype table_id page dbname
Check the link below if you need to get user name, host name, database name, index name object name and object owner instead of their ID numbers: